With Just 8 Crucial Words, the Ex-CEO of Google Taught the Most Important Lesson Every Leader Must Learn
Find me five other leaders who will make a statement like this, especially when they know they're to blame.
It's lonely at the top. But it's loneliest when you have to admit you've failed.
Witness Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google from 2001 to 2011, and
executive chairman of Google and then Alphabet until last year.
A lot of good things happened during those years. But there's a big,
glaring failure that's become especially apparent lately: Google's
inability to make a go of it in social media.
Schmidt was asked about that failure recently, and his answer was one
for the ages--one that showed true leadership, and that honestly stopped
me in my tracks when I saw it. The first eight words are probably the
most important.
"I need to take responsibility for that failure," he said. "There were
plenty of things that went unwell, but I think that in my CEO-ship, that
was probably the one that I missed the biggest."
Here's the history, the context, and why Schmidt's answer is so crucial.
A brief history of social media at Google
Go back to 2011. Google was pouring money and time into its most recent
social media foray, Google+, the silver bullet that was supposedly going
to destroy Facebook.
In fact, hours after it was announced, Mark Zuckerberg called an
all-hands meeting to figure out how Facebook would handle this
"existential threat." (His words.) But in truth, Google+ had massive
problems from the start.
It never quite had features or UX as good as Facebook's. Moreover,
Google tried to "brute force" its way to a massive user base, by
basically creating accounts for millions of people who had signed up for
and were using other Google services. Result: extremely poor user
engagement.
At the exact same time, a team of two people with a total of $500,000
investment were launching the company that would become Instagram.
You know how this ends. Instagram made its founders into billionaires;
Google+ announced last month that it's shutting down--"sunsetting," in
corporatespeak--by next year.
"The Google cultural DNA"
With that background, I can't imagine how you'd interview Schmidt today
and not ask about this big failure during his time there.
On his podcast with Schmidt, economist Tyler Cowen put it this way:
"What was it that was missing in the Google cultural DNA that made it
hard to succeed with social networks?"
(Hmmm. The "cultural DNA?"
Fortunately, Schmidt didn't take the easy way out. Here's his full answer:
Well, first place, I need to take responsibility for that failure.
There were plenty of things that went unwell, but I think that in my
CEO-ship, that was probably the one that I missed the biggest.
And my answer is because we didn't use it, that we were of the age
where we were more comfortable with telephones and email and that kind
of stuff, and this was emerging. And there really was a slightly younger
generation that was really driving it. The stuff was invented well past
when I was in college.
And because we didn't collectively use it, I suspect we didn't fully
understand how to do it. I think we've remedied this. For example,
today we have quite a powerful social network embedded inside of
YouTube, but I think it would be fair to say that the rise of Facebook,
etcetera, occurred on my watch.
Unpack this, and I think it's very powerful for at least three reasons.
He takes responsibility, full stop. He uses the first person singular: "the one that I missed."
He cops to an unflattering explanation. He failed in part because he was simply too old to understand.
Finally, he praises the other people around him--talking about the
progress Google has made since then, including apparently after Schmidt
has moved on.
Leaders take responsibility
Sure, you can say that this admission comes too late. Schmidt's
leadership at Google and Alphabet is in the history books. He's made his
money and his mark. He has nothing to lose.
But in a way that almost makes this more poignant.
The job of being a leader never really ends, and a true leader does two things:
He or she takes action and actually leads.
And when things don't go well, he or she takes responsibility for the failure.
That second truth is a hard one. It's painful. It's one that a lot of so-called leaders never really embrace.
Sometimes in the short run, it works out well for them. But Schmidt isn't playing a short-term game here. He has no reason to.
Instead, he's showing long-term leadership. No matter what his eventual
legacy turns out to be, words and actions like this will reflect well on
him. It's an excellent lesson for any leader to learn.
https://www.geezgo.com/sps/47629
Join Geezgo for free. Use Geezgo's end-to-end encrypted Chat with your Closenets (friends, relatives, colleague etc) in personalized ways.>>
No comments